Sunday, August 9, 2009

Will Obama, the half-term rookie Senator, become the second George McGovern?

%26quot;You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing%26#039;s replaced them,%26quot; Obama said.



And it%26#039;s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren%26#039;t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.%26quot;



Let us count the ways that this is a disastrous declaration:



1. “Nothing’s replaced them”? Small rural towns that saw a lot of closed plants and farm depression in the 1980s, a lot has “replaced them” explaining why for much of the last decade the national unemployment rate has been below 5%.



2. “They”. This evokes Michelle’s similar “they” (as in the “they” who raised the proverbial bar on the Obamas), and likewise suggests both hostility and a certain us/they contempt for a slice of America that the Obamas apparently know very little about but for the first time in their lives are rapi



Will Obama, the half-term rookie Senator, become the second George McGovern?honda finance





Yes, his compartmental thinking is evident in his speech, if only one cares to listen, but in Dusseldorf, people, for the most part, are not capable of understanding the full impact of his words. It is all lost upon them.



Good try, though.



Will Obama, the half-term rookie Senator, become the second George McGovern?

loan



Hopefully....|||Will he learn. Which one is trying not to get the nomination. What next. it%26#039;s in his court and then Bill comes out with %26#039;bosnia part duex%26quot;, what is next and who do the republicans want to run against? It is mind blowing. anyway a friend that is an Obama supporter stated his words were not understood. Remeber he went to a big college like George Bush. Whats up with Sen. Kerry saying he wanred us about electing a rich white man. Take care.

Why cant I find a job?

I have been looking for a job for the last three months. I am a college stuedent at the local communtiy college. My job went out of business about three months ago and I am having no luck. I have been going to places and been applying on line like crazy. Plus were I live the unemployment rate is rising, but you think I could find a job some where.



Why cant I find a job?heart rate monitor





Look at www.winninginthemargins.com passkey 112613.



It might be an answer.



Why cant I find a job?

loan



If lack of experience is a problem, start with student jobs on campus.

Why do people keep saying Bill Clinton was the worst time ever for America?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1114...



We had a steady growth, we had the lowest unemployment rate in history. He took control of the government that had a 370 billion deficit, he turned that into a surplus. 18 million jobs were created in the private sector, the list goes on. just read the above link from a real news source.



Why do people keep saying Bill Clinton was the worst time ever for America?credit card debt





Billy wasnt a saint but times under Clinton were much better than under Bush



Why do people keep saying Bill Clinton was the worst time ever for America? loan



Shame?



Actually the unemployment rate is lower under GW, but you won%26#039;t hear that on the news.|||FOX NEWS and Right Wing propaganda. You were alive during the Clinton years so which was better? I think back then was better don%26#039;t you think?|||He was too busy kissing up to other leaders and trying too hard to make other countries like America.SO WHAT IF SOME CORRUPTED COUNTRIES DONT LIKE AMERICA.No matter how hard America tried,its a jealousy thing.|||anything good was destroyed by him disgracing the office and committing perjury.|||People don%26#039;t like to remember the good---but they will never forget the bad.....|||Because they are conservative and cannot stand the fact that a brilliant politician outwitted them for over 8 years!|||because they are not old enough to remember bill clinton. . Jobs were plenty, we were out of debt. I thought he was a dang good president.|||Mostly because they are republican stooges. Clinton did sell us out to the Chinese/Indians and signed NAFTA, Bush just put these policies on steroids.|||I lived great under Clinton|||Because they forgot about LBJ and his %26quot;great society program%26quot; and J Carter.|||He was an embarrassment. Monica, Jeniffer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Vince Foster, Sandy Berger, Travel gate, Whitewater, Hillary%26#039;s insider trading, Hillary%26#039;s health care plan and on, and on, and on.



Oh, let%26#039;s not forget, he let Osama bin Laden go free twice.



One more thing, Bill Clinton gets alot of credit for things Bill Clinton never did. For example can anyone name any major accomplishment during his first two years in office? His accomplishments came after the second year of his first term! Why? Because a Republican controlled Congress made him keep the promises he made when he ran for President 2 years earlier. Check for yourself. This is a true statement.|||Because people look at his personal life and attach that to his presidency. Honestly I don%26#039;t care if he slept with Hillary%26#039;s mother, as long as the economy is straight, I%26#039;m good to go. Thats his personal life.



Clinton was great for the economy. I%26#039;m not sure Hillary will be the same.|||cuz media sucks and they are running out of brittany spears and lindsay lohan stories so they have to challenge stuff they know is false.



What do you call an asshole with a lobotomy?



-A Republican|||idk... the english media is not biased or anything? English love those touchy feelie presidents. I%26#039;m lucky that I didn%26#039;t work in the white house around Bill Clinton and his cigars :)|||He got that surplus at the cost of our national defense, we have had to rebuild our military after 9-11, we should always have a strong defense. Read Dereliction Of Duty and you will find out how Clinton made his little nest egg for wifey%26#039;s botched Nationalized Health Care scam.|||Bubba slashed the military to create a false surplus, the taxes were almost double that of Bush, he rode the dot com bubble until it burst and handed a recession to Bush, the list goes on and by the way, the BBC loves Bubba ...I don%26#039;t



He did nothing to fight terrorism except to arrest a handful in the first attack on the WTC, so there was no %26quot;peace%26quot; under Bubba



The list of terrorist attacks went on unchecked and disregarded, OBL was allowed to plan 9-11 under Bubba and he did nothing, the Kohbar Towers were attacked, the USS Cole and the list goes on..



Don%26#039;t waste your vote on yet another Clintoon in 08



Vote for McCain in 08|||Bill Clintion had good plans and policies, however, his affairs with secretaries and workers, most likely true, reverse his politics and cause people to dislike him because he has no morals.|||It wasn%26#039;t the worst time for America however, Clinton balanced the budget for only one year. To say the he balanced the budget for all years and left Bush with a surplus would be false. That being said, balancing the budget -even for just one year- is no easy task.



Many people,including myself, resent what he did to Elian and his use of machine guns and tear gas to take him away from his family. That and non stop scandals hurt Clinton%26#039;s image and credibility.|||I don%26#039;t understand that either the only thing I can think of is he voted for NAFTA. and look what that%26#039;s done to the USA.|||he disrespected america, his wife, and every other person who sat in the oval office by doing what he did with monica lewinsky in that office|||They don%26#039;t...Clinton was probably the best president since JFK...Personal life has nothing to do with running the country...|||Because upon further review none of that turned out to be true. The accounting scandal with Arthur Anderson meant that the prosperity numbers were cooked. World.com and Enron were frauds. Bosina, he got a stealth shot down and stealth technology has proliferated. It%26#039;s said that the Euro-Fighter is better than the F-18. Lastly as a result of the scandals, we have what we have now. Bill Clinton shot off two cruise missile at Osama Bin Laden. He never intended to do anything but take attention away from the Monica Lewinsky/Paula Jones/ Whitewater scandals. He missed and Osama Bin Laden came back at us. I%26#039;d say that would make him one of the worst presidents we%26#039;ve had. I could go on and on.|||they hate peace %26amp; prosperity cause too many people are happy %26amp; then ain%26#039;t happy less thar neighber is cryin%26#039;|||Anyone who says he %26quot;was the worst time ever for America%26quot; is an idiot. We%26#039;ve had worser times. They%26#039;re probably Obama supporters who say that.|||The figures you quote, while correct, are misleading. Clinton%26#039;s figures were so good because of 12 years of Republican stewardship. Get off the deficit thing...370 billion to the US is like 3 dollars to Bill Gates. Clinton failed to ever replace a single Patriot missile fired during Desert Storm, cut military spending, lied to a federal grand jury under oath, lied to the American people and horrible taste in interns.



And you%26#039;re an Obama supporter? Check your buddy%26#039;s stance on ethanol and duel fueled vehicles. It takes 6 times as much energy to produce the ethanol as the ethanol itself produces. Boy, that%26#039;s smart!



Ask yourself a queston...where was Obama before being selected as keynote speaker 4 years ago at the Dem convention? He is nothing more than a puppet with no track record whatsoever.|||Everybody in America during Clinton administration have a job and money. Times were better during his mandate. What he did as people mention here in reference to Monica Lewinsky belongs to his private life, I don%26#039;t have nothing to do with his personal life, that belongs to Hillary his wife. What cares about a President is how is working as a leader not how he perform sexually behind doors. Clinton wiped out the deficit and the economy was clean, I mean spotless. Now under Bush administration he is leaving the economy in crisis and with a deficit that even our future grandchildren are in debt. But there is a worst blind that one who don%26#039;t want to see and Americans are blinds by option. Having so clear in front of their eyes that the economic crisis is affecting America. The other day the Republicans said that during Clinton times %26quot;anybody even Mickey Mouse%26quot; could handle the economy. If it is that easy why they don%26#039;t do it? Why they don%26#039;t go to Disneyland to hire him? I%26#039;m sick and tired of the republicans and their rhetoric. Clinton was an excellent president and in modern times in my humble opinion the best!|||Over and over Intelligence warned Bill Clinton that the terrorists%26#039; cells were increasing and becoming increasingly dangerous. Then came the first bombing of the Trade Center and the bombing of the USS Cole. Just like Somalia, Rwanda, East Timor... Bill Clinton didn%26#039;t do a damn thing. He fired a couple of rockets into Afghanistan, called it a victory and went back to Monica.



If Bill Clinton had been any kind of a Commander in Chief, there is a strong chance the Twin Towers would still be standing today.



He is the worst President in this coiuntry%26#039;s history. Signing NAFTA into law hurt this country and opened up many possibilities for Bill when he left office.|||The period between 1981 and now has been a very good economic time for America and Clinton%26#039;s time in office was part of that.



The way in which you phrase it gives credit to Clinton%26#039;s Administration for things that were not his doing. Like the rooster taking credit for the dawn.



The Republican Congress forced a balanced budget on Clinton. Remember Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution gives Congress not the President power over the budget.



The dot.com boom and the internet created a lot of those jobs as did international trade which many Democrats are now having second thoughts about.Unemployment has been lower during the Bush Administration.



None of that is really important since the economy flows from Administration to Administration unless Congress makes the monumentally stupid mistake of raising taxes on personal or corporate income as the current Democratic Congress is planning to do and both Democratic presidential contenders are promising their supporters. That guarantees disaster.



The answer to your question however is that the political climate in the Democratic party is toxic.



Clinton was well regarded personally and politically by Democrats until sizable numbers of activists inside the party backed another candidate for the presidential nomination in 2008. Mrs. Clinton was also highly revered.



In order for Obama to win when the going got tough, those who supported him had to take down Bill Clinton and his %26quot;legacy%26quot; and they didn%26#039;t care what the cost was to the Democratic party. Win at any cost.



They didn%26#039;t care how much money the Clintons had raised for the party or what they had done over the years. The Clintons had to be destroyed.



The same crew had done it to a fine former Governor of Texas and a long-time Democratic Senator from Connecticut so they knew how to do it.



Kill them. Stake in the heart. No loyalty. No mercy.



There wasn%26#039;t anything wrong with the Clinton Administration.



I%26#039;m a Republican and I disagree with his philosophy of government (and a few teensy other little problems of course) but neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton deserves what the Obama forces have done to them and their record in the White House.

I'd like to move to CA but am reluctant because I won't have a job.?

I have heard of so many people taking the risk and finding employment and are quite happy. My problem is I%26#039;m not happy where I live nor am I happy with my current job (no promotional opportunities where I work and the unemployment rate is very high). Any suggestions?



I%26#039;d like to move to CA but am reluctant because I won%26#039;t have a job.?care credit





The cost of living in very high, look up how much it cost for an apartment. How much money do you have.



I%26#039;d like to move to CA but am reluctant because I won%26#039;t have a job.? loan



I would have SOME sort of back up plan if you go out there because the cost of living is tremendous. Do you have friends or family you could fall back on in case it takes you longer than normal to find a job, etc.? Just remember not every one goes to CA with a %26quot;dream%26quot; and having it fullfilled....a lot of it is knowing the right people and networking, and just plain luck.|||Try an employment website such as careerbuilder or monster to see if they have listings in the city you are planning to move to. Some companies would even pay for relocation if you ask.



Look before you leap.

Moving to germany?

how different is the unemployment rate/cost of living/size between berlin, loitsche, liepzig, madgeburg?



Moving to germany?inflation rate





Unemployment rate in East Germany, that%26#039;s where the citys are located you are reffering to, is quite high. higher than the German everage which was 8.0 % in 2006



The Costs of Living there are slightly lower than in western Germany although the payment you get for a job is lower in east Germany as well. Renting an appartment is indeed cheaper there.



To make it easier for you:



Reffering to http://www.karriere-im-ausland.de



Cost of living in American citys like New York, Chicago or San Diego are about 50% higher than in Germany. Although the cost of living in the US vary from state to state.



Jobwise they say the following:



Payments in the US vary from state to state as well but in general unskilled workforce get less money in the US than in Germany wheras educated people and skilled workes are paid better in the USA.



In case you need assistance in English check the German department of foreign affairs: http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/...



They will also answer any email you send to them as they are forced to do so by law as far as I know.



Hope that was kind of helpful

Just curious...?

people always say that immigrants are taking our jobs. however, our nation has a very, very low unemployment rate (less than 10% which is almost fully employed)



so if basically all of our labor force is employed despite immigrants fulfilling jobs, then how exactly are they stealing jobs?



i am NOT making an inference. i am seriously asking this question because i know someone out there has an explanation for both sides.



Just curious...?credit bureau





It just shows you how ignorant we Americans can be and the tremendous power the media has in us. Many people just %26quot;blindly%26quot; and %26quot;deafly%26quot; believe what they hear and don%26#039;t care about questioning it and much less researching the statistics to prove that it is true. Everyone in the media is saying that immigrants are taking over jobs, people believe it without questioning and keep on spreading the word. No one questions the %26quot;fact%26quot; and before you know it everyone is attacking and blaming the immigrants out of ignorance!!!! =)



Just curious...? loan



Deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation, deportation,



NOW.|||The 4.5% only counts those actively looking for work. It does not count those, for instance, in school full-time because they cannot get a job. I found myself in that situation for over 18 months.



You should also look at the statistics more deeply. The unemployment rate for college graduates (Bachelors and above) is very low indeed. However, it gets higher and higher for those with less formal education. Many people who did not graduate from high school have difficulty finding jobs. There used to be manual labor jobs for those people. Granted, immigrants are not the sole cause of the problem, but there is no doubt that it is cheaper to employ an illegal immigrant than it is to employ a citizen or legal resident, simply because there are no payroll or withholding taxes to worry about.



By the way, as a legal immigrant I detest illegals being here and taking up resources without paying their way (I do taxes for a living so I am familiar with the cost to the country). I have also, in my time, taken jobs that people do not want to do. I did that so that I could get ahead. There are millions of people who have come to the USA and done that, and we have managed to do it legally.|||What people are saying is that Illegal aliens are taking jobs and driving down wages among other things. Illegal aliens do not qualify as legitimate workers by virtue of their immigration status. If an illegal alien is working it is keeping a legal immigrant from that very position. In essence, that illegal stole an opportunity that he/she was not eligible for. When they steal something they take something from an entity IE: person, community,organization that otherwise does not belong to them.|||US population 300million -4.5%= 13.5 million unemployed



12 million illegal aliens



while not 100% of the population is of working age, niether is the population of illegal aliens, so I%26#039;ll give you the 1.5 million.



12 million to 12 million....seems to me that we could be at 100% employment rate without the illegal aliens being here.



EDIT~~~~~Because immigration increases the supply of U.S. labor, it reduces wages or makes jobs more scarce for natives. Job competition between immigrants and natives is especially fierce at the bottom of the labor market, because so many immigrants are employed in the low-skilled/low-wage segments of the economy. When the average American wage exceeds the average Mexican wage by a factor of ten, even the most menial American job can be a forceful inducement to emigrate.



The large number of immigrants with low levels of education means that immigration policy has dramatically increased the supply of workers with less than a high school degree. Although immigrants comprise about 12 percent of America%26#039;s workforce, they account for 31 percent of high school dropouts in the workforce. This means that any effects on the wages or job opportunities of natives will disproportionately affect less-skilled workers. Immigrants are 60 percent more likely to be employed in low-skilled occupations than are native-born workers.



As a consequence, poverty in the U.S. is increasingly being driven by immigration policy. Between 1979 and 1997, immigrant households increased their representation in the U.S. population by 68 percent, but over that same period their share of the total poor population increased 123 percent. And the gap between the immigrant and native poverty rates is widening - this gap tripled between 1979 and 1997.



One of the factors that is thought to mitigate the consequences of immigrant poverty is entrepreneurship, with immigrant small businessmen supposedly recharging our nation%26#039;s creative spirit. Unfortunately, research shows that while immigrants were once significantly more entrepreneurial than natives, that is no longer true.



Between 2000 and 2005, 4.1 million immigrant workers arrived from abroad, accounting for 86 percent of the net increase in the total number of employed persons (16 and older), the highest share ever recorded in the United States.



Of the 4.1 million new immigrant workers, between 1.4 and 2.7 million are estimated to be illegal immigrants. This means that illegal immigrants accounted for up to 56 percent of the net increase in civilian employment in the United States over the past five years.



Between 2000 and 2005, the number of young (16 to 34) native-born men who were employed declined by 1.7 million; at the same time, the number of new male immigrant workers increased by 1.9 million.



Multivariate statistical analyses show that the probability of teens and young adults (20-24) being employed was negatively affected by the number of new immigrant workers (legal and illegal) in their state.



The negative impacts tended to be larger for younger workers, for in-school youth compared to out-of-school youth, and for native-born black and Hispanic males compared to their white counterparts.



It appears that employers are substituting new immigrant workers for young native-born workers. The estimated sizes of these displacement effects were frequently quite large.



The increased hiring of new immigrant workers also has been accompanied by important changes in the structure of labor markets and employer-employee relationships. Fewer new workers, especially private-sector wage and salary workers, are ending up on the formal payrolls of employers, where they would be covered by unemployment insurance, health insurance, and worker protections.|||the unemployment rate is based on people receiving unemployment compensation. when their unemployment payments run out(or they have not yet filed) they are off the list. also not on the list are people that have quit for some reason or have been fired etc. there a lot of reasons that they are not on the list.|||you are a nice guy Sergio|||First the unemployment numbers to not reflex the true state of employment or unemployment in the USA. Even it they do it does not give the illegals the right to come and make themselves at home, put their children in schools, and then steal or buy document so that they can have all that we have to ofter. Why do many such as yourself not understand that we the citizens of the USA have the right to control our borders and have a say in the matter of who can come|||LOW unemployment rate? Where do you live?|||You are right but this rant is so convenient to their argument. They would not take a job farming or McDonalds. I know I wouldn%26#039;t but then again I have a degree and a career already so no one is taking my job away. OUR jobs are not being taken away! Some companies are going overseas because production cost is cheaper. Don%26#039;t worry, it%26#039;s an argument that will be heard probably a thousand times more, it gets tiring, really.|||It is renewed racism against Native Americans. Latin is an Italian language.



Sexism and Racism cost government nothing.|||you do pose an interesting question.



so, all of a sudden people WANT to work at Walmart? want to work in the fields of Fresno?



If the job you are seeking puts you in a position in which you must compete with illegal immigrants, then it must not be a very good job.



its a job that a high school dropout would want.



unfortunately, all the people that shout deport deport deport



SHOULD look be looking at how illegal immigration out.



i highly doubt the deport shouters would WANT to do the jobs.



so if not them, then who?



the only ones who should be deported are the gangbangers.



they cause the crime. they should be deported, legal or illegal.

Are you riding a bike or walking more now that gas is so high?

I was a Kmart this weekend and several people were buying bikes for that reason.



I was just wondering if thats because where I live (Detroit - we have the highest unemployment rate) or if its pretty much everywhere.....lemme know whatcha think



Are you riding a bike or walking more now that gas is so high?child tax credit





I%26#039;m walking a lot more. It used to be I%26#039;d hop in my car to go to the 7/11 a block and a half away - now I see the stupidity of that! I%26#039;m also taking the bus more. I%26#039;m in Los Angeles, and I don%26#039;t know if there are more people on bikes because of the high price of gas, or if just that many more people got arrested for drunk driving and had their licenses suspended...



;-)



Are you riding a bike or walking more now that gas is so high?

loan



i ride the bus|||pt and bike.|||I live in Los Angeles, CA and gas is about $3.70.. I still drive my car for about 40 miles a day. There%26#039;s no way I can bike that far or take a bus. I have no choice|||no b/c i need my car for work...and everything else is too far to ride a bike to (i live in so. cali).|||I have been trying to walk and ride my bike when I am trying to get around town.|||Still driving.

What would happen if policy makers ,committed to full employment,?

encounter major problems, if they underestimate the natural unemployment rate.



What would happen if policy makers ,committed to full employment,?mortgage lenders





They would cause high inflation.



What would happen if policy makers ,committed to full employment,? loan



Well, we%26#039;d predict a forced increase in aggregate demand. Given the upward curve of the supply schedule, there%26#039;d be a marked increase in the price of goods: that%26#039;s inflation.



Inflation is bad. Once it starts, inflationary expectations can continue to drive prices higher and higher.



Given the time lag it takes to a) measure economic factors and b) enact policy, odds are the economic cycle will have changed before you%26#039;ve made any actions. It%26#039;s usually best to let the market sort itself out.|||Too many dollars would chase too few goods. In other words, inflation. The Fed will not commit to full employment. They will continue to be more of the %26quot;inflation watchdogs%26quot;.

Why do the Neo-Stalinists in Congress think the economy can take a $400 Billion tax hike?

Anybody think that this is a good idea? What do they want to spend it on? How many want to bet the unemployment rate goes way up from 4.5%?



Why do the Neo-Stalinists in Congress think the economy can take a $400 Billion tax hike?unemployment rate





why would they consider a tax increase when tax revenues are higher now than they were before the tax cut? the stupid and the greedy will never learn. the unemployment rate will go up due to the fact that in order to cover the extra tax burden, businesses will cut payroll i.e. employee lay offs. the democrats never learn!



Why do the Neo-Stalinists in Congress think the economy can take a $400 Billion tax hike? loan



have you seen the deficit the boy President has run up? i can%26#039;t even say that many digits.|||You all said Reagan%26#039;s tax cuts were fiscally responsible, and a boon to growth. Instead we dipped further into recession, ran enormous deficits and it took 6 years before government revenue returned to 1981 levels.



You all said Clinton%26#039;s tax policy would give us a recession. Instead we got the longest period of constant growth in the history of the country.



You all said Bush%26#039;s tax cuts would fire the economy so much they would pay for themselves. Instead we got the largest deficit in history and slower growth than under Clinton.



What makes you think the Right have any place commenting on tax policy given it has been sooooooo wrong about the last three administrations?|||Ignore the deficit and it will go away.

Why do conservatives think social programs dont work? (they have helped millions of americans get ba

there are always going to be some people take advantage of these programs but a majority of people that use these programs benefit to make something of themselves. before these programs were passed by lbj and fdr we has a higher unemployment rate, less people in college, and more people without good housing. thanks to these programs over time many families have broken the cylcle of poverty. that is the goal of these programs to break a cycle of poverty that many families have endured for generations. source: im a social work grad student who has studied this subject extensively.



Why do conservatives think social programs dont work? (they have helped millions of americans get backontrack)payment calculator





It%26#039;s because they don%26#039;t care- they%26#039;re not poor, they don%26#039;t need the social programs, so it%26#039;s very easy to overlook them in favor of pork barrel-laden bills and programs designed to make the rich richer.



Look at some European countries that have a higher standard of living than the US... they are more socially-geared, with aid in the forms of healthcare and supporting large families. There is a much smaller gap between the top and the bottom. Conservatives in this country seem to favor that gap. :/



Why do conservatives think social programs dont work? (they have helped millions of americans get backontrack)

loan



Because many of the people that speak against them have not had the need for any of the programs and do not understand. People find it easy to ignore problems that do not effect them until they are put into those shoes.|||I agree with you, the majority of people on it are just trying to get back on their feet and do so with this help. But conservatives think it the other way around, that the majority are just taking advantage of it (they believe some take it to get back on their feet but the majority are taking advantage of it) and so feel it would be wrong to take money from those who do work to support those who don%26#039;t and don%26#039;t want to. I don%26#039;t know which is more accurate, but in the end I feel even if I help just one it is better than allowing them to die for no reason and without dignity. But it still isn%26#039;t fair to take money from those who do work for sure, just to support those who don%26#039;t (even when they could). It is a matter of what you think is more just and caring.|||because they perpetuate themselves... whole families are brought up in the welfare state and their children continue the same patterns...



and the amount of waste (and fraud) on these programs is ridiculous... all of our taxes would be put to better use if the fat and illegal use were eliminated



Liberty Over Liberalism!|||Conservatives set the bar too high. Unless the problem is completely solved, the social program is considered by them to be a failure. But when it comes to human problems, they never end because there are always more people being born to embody certain problems. But even if a problem isn%26#039;t resolved once and for all, for the individuals who get helped, it does make a difference, and we should count that a success.



Actually, the present-day Republican Party has recently been converted to believing the efficacy of Social Engineering. They now attempt to use the government, but for %26quot;conservative%26quot; purposes, especially when it comes to Bush%26#039;s %26quot;Faith-Based Initiative%26quot;.|||Social programs %26quot;don%26#039;t work%26quot; for the wealthy because the wealthy don%26#039;t use them but have to pay for them. That%26#039;s their reasoning.|||In your extensive studies, where is your evidence that these programs caused the beneficial effects that you are listing?



The demographics that receive welfare continue to be the struggling groups in our society. No one has ever become rich off of welfare. Those are the main reasons that conservatives think these programs don%26#039;t work.



For those bashing the Republican party - the questioner referred to %26quot;conservatives%26quot; - and Republicans don%26#039;t fit the bill there any longer. OK - except in stupid stuff like %26quot;social%26quot; issues. But economically, they are no longer conservative.



And what timm1776 said below.|||they do work i have been in the program and it helped me to support my family.



They are rich and don%26#039;t want to pay taxes. Don%26#039;t want to raise minimun wage. While the rich raise there wages.



These are all lies. To show they are for something most people agree with come out against gay marriage or abortion.



Becuase it makes them look good and it effects very few people and probably not many voters.|||All one has to do is drive down Martin Luther King Jr Blvd or a trailer park in any city during the day and see people gathered in front of convenience stores and front porches not working. I doubt if they all have night jobs. Yes, you say some might abuse the system but it is becoming more rampant. Conservatives are not against these programs altogether but I must say it makes me sick to think my hard earned tax dollars are going to some scam artists and lazy bums who just don%26#039;t want to work. They don%26#039;t educate themselves (They choose to do poorly in school K-12 and then ***** about only making minimum wage). In it%26#039;s present condition, many of these social programs just reward laziness and ignorance. I agree that there are many people who do have valid issues like losing a job or becoming handicapped etc where they need a hand up but not a hand out.|||Even Clinton knew it was bad to have too many social programs. I was proud of him for Welfare Reform. And I%26#039;m proud of Bush for not changing it. In about 1997 I talked to two women mad because they hadn%26#039;t gotten their welfare check yet, they acted like it was their right to get it and stay on it. They said they had been on it for 15 years and would stay on it. I said, %26quot;do you know it%26#039;s other people%26#039;s taxes paying for it%26quot; and they said %26quot;So what!%26quot; I love the 5 year program with the GED, and welfare to work .|||First of all, I think most conservatives would admit that the social programs work some of the time. I think much of their opposition comes from a critique of the efficiency and ethics of welfare, not from a failure to recognize the benefit it can have.



A number of conservatives see our welfare programs as an inefficient means of helping the poor. They believe they are administratively heavy, lack proper accountability, and could give stronger incentives to self-help. It doesn%26#039;t mean they are totally agains the idea of social assistance. They just think it can be done better with less waste.



A number of conservatives (and libertarians like myself) also have ethical concerns about government assistance. In it%26#039;s simplest form, welfare represents taking someone%26#039;s rightful property under the force of violence or imprisonment, and giving it to someone else, without the donor%26#039;s consent...all to assuage the moral guilt of some segment of society. This is using the force of government to advance a particular view of morality, and that%26#039;s something a lot of people are against. I think a lot of conservatives are fine with assistance to the needy, as long as it doesn%26#039;t come from the state. They recognize that people need a leg up from time to time, but think churches, voluntary organizations, and families are more efficient and more ethical means of proving help.



I%26#039;d also like to point out that things like the unemployment rate, housing rate, and college attendance rates are cyclical things. They are also affected by a variety of conditions in society, not just welfare programs. I mean, the unemployment rate is also affected by tax cuts, technological development, seasonal variation, etc. You haven%26#039;t provided enough info to establish a causal relationship.

Illegal immigrants are criminals...?

illegal immigrants are breaking the law but the reason they come here illegaly because it is so hard for them to get papers...so necesity brings them to extreme measures crossing the border is no walk in the park hundreds of mexicans die trying to cross over. QUESTION Are immigrants criminals for wanting a better life?And its not true that they rape the country of money we have one of the best economies in the world and as far as im concerned the unemployment rate is at 5% nationally so who are the immigrants taking the jobs from high school students? WE LOVE THE USA AND APPRECIATE THE HELP THAT THEY%26#039;VE GIVEN US AND IM SORRY IF YOUR POOR BECAUSE OF US....



Illegal immigrants are criminals...?credit check





i am a american and proud to say i have a perfect mexican wife,people from mexico work like all the first families of the new america had to work,---- very hard and for many hours ,now mexicans work for very little pay,both in mexico and in the usa,mexican wifes respect the husbands as the head of the house,do american wifes?mexicans don%26#039;t complain that they must work,nor do they wast money on stupid stuff, do americans? we have grown very lazy as a nation look around do i lie? their gov steals and lies has ours ever been caught at this?--by the way my wife must live in mexico because yes its very dam hard to get approval from immigration to be together,so may be i may have to be a immigrant worker their in mexico,but they will not be disrespectful to me because my government would not help me to have a better life, our gov like all are smoke and mirror%26#039;s, its just a big game played by rich boy%26#039;s with no concern for the life of the simple man and the promise to represent and defend our rights ,its not about mexico can%26#039;t anyone see past the propaganda look around the world every one is controlled by some one else-even CNN-ABC-BBC



Illegal immigrants are criminals...? loan



NO.|||Thank you. This is the first time i%26#039;ve seen a question on the immigration issue in which the asker isnt ripping on immigrants and declaring death to all of them.|||No, their just illegal. And they take all of our jobs.|||nope get them out, we have our own to care about. There are others legal ways to work here.|||the only logical way we can condemn immigrants, legal or otherwise, is by considering ourselves as more important than people born in a different part of the world.



borders are silly human inventions.|||Your question is soooo wrong. First of all, they are all criminals by definiton when they entire the country illegally. Every single one. Yes, they do rape the economy. They don%26#039;t pay income taxes, and rely on our national services disppraportionally. California is losing money hand over fist because of them. Furthermore, less than 20 percent of them work in agriculture (the jobs american%26#039;s won%26#039;t take). The rest take substandard wages in sectors that legal people want jobs. Lowering the going rate for wages. They%26#039;re destroying our economy.|||immigrants ain%26#039;t criminals illegal immigrants are.|||I can see both sides but I can%26quot;t find a job right now! I live in a bldg. full of mexicans they all are driving brand new cars and working for less wages. The government is helping them and leaving us stranded!!YOU ARE AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT OR YOU WERE!|||People are so brainwashed by the media. Illegal immigrants are taking jobs away from Americans? Right. Because there are so many Americans who want to do the jobs illegal immigrants do...like picking in the fields where immigrants die from the heat, cleaning office buildings, gardening, cleaning people%26#039;s houses, taking care of people%26#039;s kids. What you don%26#039;t hear is that many of these immigrants use social security numbers that belong to someone else, so they%26#039;re actually paying taxes and paying into social security, which they will NEVER collect on. They actually add more to the economy and get less. It%26#039;s too bad the media is AFRAID to report the facts and resorts to scare tactics to sell newspapers and advertising.|||Technically they%26#039;re criminals because they%26#039;re breaking immigration laws, but the penalty for that is deportation, not jail.



I find it interesting that people want to make them criminals so we can put them in jail, thus housing them at a yearly cost of $25,000 each. How does this help our economy?



FYI, according to a report cited by the Washington Post, 32% of male undocumented workers work in agriculture, 15% employed by manufacturers and 13% in commerce and sales. Women mostly work in commerce and sales, followed by manufacturing and domestic service.|||anyone who does illegal things is supposed to be a criminal.|||No, the illegal immigrants aren%26#039;t criminals for wanting a better life, but they ARE criminals when they do the following:



1. Steal a social security number from a deceased American



2. Take advantage of public assistance such as welfare, food stamps, section 8 housing



3. Have multiple numbers of children and leave U.S. hospitals to pay the tab.|||Illegals draw welfare by stealing people%26#039;s social security numbers and identities. That means there are a lot of people being directly hurt by these people as well. Innocent people are having their credit ratings ruined, having IRS problems, and social security problems. If someone who has had their social security number stolen gets married, if either spouse dies or become disabled then they can be denied their benefits.



My family moved to the US before WWII. Those of my family that didn%26#039;t make it over got killed by the death camps. Our family assimilated to the American culture. We didn%26#039;t expect the Americans to change to suit us. The illegal immigrants from Mexico are not civilized like that.



They not only changed the National Anthem to Spanish, they changed the words. They already burn our flag and hang our flag upside down. They waved the Mexican flag during a lot of their protests. Some schools have stopped hanging the American flag and forbidden students from wearing clothes with any part of the American flag on their clothing all to keep from offending the Mexicans. It%26#039;s nothing short of an attack of our country, not only by the illegal aliens, but those who seek to appease them.



I am tired of the stereotype that Americans wouldn%26#039;t do the work that illegals do. Illegals do all kinds of jobs for less than minimum wage which drives the wages down for U.S. citizens. Construction jobs are an example. There are lots of illegals doing construction jobs that Americans used to do because the companies can keep more of the profits if they pay less for the workers. All that does is make companies wealthier and Americans poorer. Illegals are stealing jobs that Americans have done for years.



If you go to a country and refuse to assimilate, continuing to speak your own language then you are really not an immigrant -- you%26#039;re a colonist ... and that%26#039;s what the Mexicans are doing, they%26#039;re colonizing the American Southwest as part of their %26quot;reconquista%26quot; Read about mecha in the link I provided and you%26#039;ll see what the Mexicans real agenda is.



http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/MECh...



Most Mexicans believe the Southwestern US rightfully belongs to Mexico; and most believe they should have the right to enter the US without government permission. 鈥揨ogby Poll (June 2002)



~~~



Half of all Mexicans 鈥?over 50 million 鈥?would move to the US if given the opportunity. 鈥揚ew Hispanic Center (August 2005)



~~~



84% of Americans view Mexicans favorably.



But only 36% of Mexicans view Americans favorably.



-only 26% of Mexicans say Americans are hard-working.



-only 16% say Americans are honest.



-and 73% say Americans are racist.



-Zogby Poll (March 2006)



~~~



The prohibitive cost of providing illegals with free healthcare has shut down more than 60 hospitals in California since 1993; many more are on the verge of closing. 鈥揓ournal of American Physicians and Surgeons (Spring 2005)



~~~



Illegals enter this country without health screening. Consequently, epidemic diseases from our past 鈥?polio, tuberculosis, plague, leprosy 鈥?are on the rise.



~~~



Illegals consume $69 billion in social services annually. 鈥揜ep. Russell Pearce (AZ)



~~~



According to the US Census, 96% of the increase in public school enrollment is due to immigration.



~~~



The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that children of illegal immigrants cost public schools $28.6 billion annually.



~~~



Illegal immigrant labor depresses wages for American citizens by $200 billion a year. 鈥揕ou Dobbs, US News %26amp; World Report (01/31/05)



~~~



The cost of illegal immigration to the American taxpayer is $55,000 per illegal. 鈥揅enter for Immigration Studies (July 2001)



~~~



According to the US DEA, 92% of the cocaine sold in the US comes in through Mexico (2004) as does 65% of meth and a majority of marijuana.



~~~



Illegal immigrants (about 3% of the US population) make up almost 30% of the federal prison population. 鈥揟he Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002)



~~~



Illegal immigrants in the US commit between 1,800 and 2,500 murders each year. 鈥揗ac Johnson, Human Events (12/05/05)



~~~



Al Qaeda leaders have met with Hispanic gangs to plan terrorist attacks against the US. 鈥揟he Washington Times (09/28/04)



~~~



Armed Mexican military units have crossed into the U.S. 216 times since 1996. 鈥揟he Washington Times (01/17/06)|||If you break the law then you are a criminal. But to make absurd laws that make innocent people guilty then that makes the people who created them unlawful. There are so many laws that should not be in effect. If the law causes harm to anyone then yes it should be a crime. But to benefit in a good way no it should not be illegal.



I am not stating that they are criminals but just pointing out that we need to come up with better ways to accommodate those that want to make a better life for themselves and their family. Not those that wish to harm others due to drugs and all. Some Immigrants do come over under the cartel and drugs and that I believe is the main reason why it became illegal for any person to come across undocumented. Just the other day there were 4 immigrants caught that were under a certain gang that kills people and that I believe is a good enough reason to make it a law.



But for those that try for a better life I feel for them because they reap the bad stuff that others have done to create this law. Congress needs to work out this law and make it possible for anyone to live here legally and in a quicker and more friendly way.|||It doesnt matter why they came here, they still broke the law. I dont know about labeling them as a criminal. When i think of a criminal i think of a robbery or someone who murdurs; however its still bad because they are breaking the law. You can justify their actions by saying they did so to better their life...i dont know. theres more to it than that. Is there another country that would allow 11 million ppl to come to their country because they want a better life by disobeying the law...i dont think so|||Hop, you say the following, like it is a good thing:



%26quot;What you don%26#039;t hear is that many of these immigrants use social security numbers that belong to someone else, so they%26#039;re actually paying taxes and paying into social security, which they will NEVER collect on.%26quot;



Give me a break! You think it is okay that they steal SSNs? When they do that, they do severe damage financially to the victims whose SSNs they steal!! They screw people badly in this way! Why do you and the other illegal immigrants not know how bad this is to do to people?? As well, I%26#039;ve read on this forum many times that illegals also often claim so many dependents that they don%26#039;t hardly get any taxes taken out of their paycheques with the stolen SSNs. So, no, they don%26#039;t pay their fair share of taxes, no way! No where near what they consume in education costs, medical costs, welfare (yes, they also collect welfare with their stolen SSNs), and the costs they incur when they drive without licenses or insurance and cause accidents which, in turn, causes everyone else%26#039;s insurance premiums to go up to cover the costs.



So, yes, as long as they are in the country illegally, they are criminals and they commit more and more crimes with the fraud that they go on to commit.



Also, one more thing, even if the only jobs they were taking were jobs that high school students want, this is also not acceptable. The high school students who are legal citizens of the USA deserve those jobs and the illegal immigrants do not!



It is hard for them to get papers? Give me a break! Anything worth having is worth working for, right? Haven%26#039;t you ever heard that? It%26#039;s true! If they want their papers badly enough, they should be willing to do the work that needs to be done to get them. Then, the USA will welcome them with open arms because the USA LOVES LEGAL IMMIGRANTS!|||What are you talking about.....They are illegal in the since that every country has laws that have to be respected. When you come to a country you have to become a citizen. A legal citizen! This allows the government to take taxes out of your check just like all other legal citizens.



The reason why so many people are concerned with this (including legal Mexican Americans, Polish, Arab, Asians etc) is that these illegals are refusing to assimilate into the culture of speaking English and making someone pay them what they are worth.



Look at this way..when employers see that they have someone who is not legal but wants a job as a construction worker (example) they offer them a job for far less than what they would pay a citizen. IF the average contruction worker is making $34.00 an hour and an illegal immigrant wants to do the job for $6.50 what is going to stop the employer from hiring more illegal immigrants. The employer is saving thousands of dollars a year because they don%26#039;t have to pay out in benefits. That%26#039;s money in their pocket.



Why do you think these big companies like FORD and CINGULAR are laying off their workers and going to countries like Mexico and India? Because the labor is cheap and they can get away with paying people $3.00 a day.



When you become a legal citizen you have rights under the federal law that protects you against unfair wages, and you are able to take advantage of the many benefits that are being handed out by the federal government.



I think that they do themselves an injustice when they sell themselves short.|||As an American citizen, I cannot respect anyone who breaks the laws of my country. If they do not respect a law about the proper procedures of immigration why should I believe they will respect any law in my county. Legal immigrants have every right to come here and pursue the American dream, illegals have no rights whatsoever, however they suck system dry and and violate the the very rights on every American citizen and legal immigrant in the greatest country on earth. I have traveled extensively and can say that without impunity. Does wanting a better life warrant breaking the laws of my country. I could financially have a better life in illegal trades but I do not because their illegal. Hey are where you come from a democracy? Then do what we do vote- don%26#039;t vote - don%26#039;t *****.|||can you spell ILLEGAL They live 10 to 20 to a household and thrash the place so bad the owners make the next tenant pay more deposits to move in and the property value hits rock bottom!! then before you know it drugs and violence are daily news items.|||one: the reason they take these jobs is b/c they%26#039;ll actually do them for illegal pay (under minimum wage), which as a natural born citizen, i would never take as it only encourages such action and it%26#039;s bad enough american jobs get outsourced. and they are taking jobs frompeople other than high school students. we have plenty of unskilled workers, but they demand to be paid according to the law.



two: i have met plenty of immigrants who have wanted better lives and got here legally. i also know descendants of immigrants whose relatives can%26#039;t get over here legally, so they stay put.



three: illegal immigrants shouldn%26#039;t even be on welfare. that%26#039;s a program for CITIZENS who need help getting on their feet. plus, why be on welfare when u can work 3 jobs for peanuts?|||I thought illegal immigration was considered a misdemeanor. And yes they are taking jobs.



%26quot;Are immigrants criminals for wanting a better life?%26quot;



If you mean illegal immigrants, they are still illegal regardless of them wanting a better life.|||It is not criminal to want a better life. What is criminal is how they go about getting it. One of the disturbing things is that these illegals that cross from Mexico aren%26#039;t thinking of anyone but themselves while legals Americans are trying to think of all nations that wish to enter the land of opportunity. Illegals from Mexico have to go thru the exact same process that everyone else does, they know that and so do the people that are showing integrity and following due process.|||Yes, they are criminals.



International law dictates that in order to move from one country to another, one must be in possession of a valid passport which must be stamped at an official port of entry. Do they do that? do they ****.



Other laws dictate that in order to work in the United States, and you aren%26#039;t a US citizen, you need to apply for a work permit through the proper channels. Do they do that? NOPE!



The laws are there for a reason, and if you break them that makes you a criminal, no matter what the circumstances.|||Not all, but certain there are some.



These are the worst.



They need to be deported and jailed in their country.|||Yes, they are criminals. They help Mexico%26#039;s economy by taking jobs in the USA and sending the money back to mexico. They do not help our economy...not paying taxes, using our medical system without paying for it, using our welfare programs, and by keeping the wages so low.|||You Stated :%26quot;the rest are white americans%26quot;



By Your Own Mathematical Calculation - 20 Percent



Considering The RATIO Of ILLEGAL Aliens To



White Americans and Black Americans %26lt; (Your Words) It Would Seem That The ILLEGAL Aliens Are Drawing Proportionately



HUGE Amounts Of Aid Compared To The Others



With More Than 25 Percent Of Welfare Benefits Being Consumed By 5 Percent Of The Population



%26quot;the reason they come here illegaly because it is so hard for them to get papers..%26quot;



Tell That To The MILLIONS Of Immigrants That Took The Pains To Immigrate To Our Country LEGALLY...Im Sure Several Of Them Would Like To SLAP YOUR FACE



There Are 20 MILLION ILLEGAL Aliens



http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref...



--Less than 2 percent of Illegal Aliens are picking crops



--29 percent of Illegal Aliens are on welfare.



--29 percent of Inmates in the Federal Prisons are Illegal Aliens.



Illegal Aliens are NOT doing work Americans won%26#039;t do.



What jobs won%26#039;t Americans do?



Americans still



--clean their own houses,



--do their own landscaping,



--clean hotel rooms,



--work in restaurants and fast food places,



--paint houses,



--DO CONSTRUCTION WORK,



--work in airports, etc. -



just like we have the past 200 years before %26quot;our%26quot; government allowed these people to invade our country.



There are 18 million Americans who cannot find a job, so illegal aliens who are coming here to work do so at peril to American workers By FALSELY DEPRESSING WAGES.



Local employers figured out they could get ILLEGAL Aliens to work for less than half the same amount.



As an example, a young landscaper who used to make $15 an hour 10 YEARS AGO, can%26#039;t get a similar job now for more than $8 an hour. Same heat. Same difficult working conditions. But with the Depressed Wage, AMERICANS 鈥?who live in a country where the cost of living is miles above that of Mexico%26#039;s 鈥?can%26#039;t afford to take such jobs.It%26#039;s not that he and other Americans don%26#039;t want to do landscaping anymore; it%26#039;s just that in heavily trafficked ILLEGAL Alien environments, IT DOESNT PAY WELL ENOUGH ANYMORE.



If this is what the open borders crowd means by ILLEGAL ALIENS doing jobs Americans don%26#039;t want, they%26#039;re right. American workers want jobs that can Earn them a DECENT LIVING IN THIS COUNTRY. Minimum wage is a fortune south of the border, but it doesn%26#039;t go far here.|||Our education has dropped dramatically in border states due to need for bilingual education which costs a ton the schools don%26#039;t have and slows the entire class down. That is a serious answer.



This is not only due to illegal immigrants any more than illegal immigrants are the only ones who use welfare. However, legal residents and citizens are the ones we pay into welfare for, we don%26#039;t want to pay more to cover people who are illegally here. Similarly, we would give language help to people legally here, but it is one of the most expensive and disruptive issues in education, and we need to limit it to the amount we can manage. That amount is limited by our immigration laws. Our laws don%26#039;t make it %26#039;difficult%26#039; to get in, they flat out say we can only take so many at a time, and you have to stand in line.



I am for legalizing current qualifying illegal immigrants because I feel sorry for their situation, and do kind of think switching gears on the ones who have been here so long is tough. (Although I also think the government should ALWAYS have enforced its laws.)



However, illegal immigration is HUGELY expensive, and once you are on the paying side instead of the benefiting side, you will see that for yourself.

How do I report illegal Mexican immigrants in Michigan?

They are working for $4 /hr. and our unemployment rate is the second highest in the U.S.



How do I report illegal Mexican immigrants in Michigan?student finance





AT LEAST THEY ARE WORKING, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? OH TYPING ON YAHOO, I FORGOT



How do I report illegal Mexican immigrants in Michigan? loan



Call the INS. Get them out of here!|||How to get rid of illegal immigrants in this country:



Everybody says deport them. I say why waste the gas money? You get rid of them through economics.



1. Severely punish employers who practice the hiring of illegal immigrants. A second offense should require mandatory 5 year prison sentences, and a loss of their business license. Make it a hazard to employers to hire illegals.



2. fine landlords monthly for housing illegal immigrants.



3. Cut Illegals off from any and all government benefits.



4. Have Illegal immigrant%26#039;s house and land property siezed by the government.



If we do these things, it%26#039;ll be nearly impossible for an illegal immigrant to live in the United States. They%26#039;ll deport themselves.|||Call ICE, Call Homeland Security. Dont waste your time calling the state law enforcement they will not respond.|||uscis.gov|||What branch of law enforcement do you belong to.... and how did you confirm they are %26quot;illegal%26quot;?



You know, in Germany, under Hitler, neighbor was encourage to rat on neighbors; children to rat on parents.. There were no checks and balances and millions of people died.



Is that what you are hoping for here?



If you want employment - move to Colorado...they are having to use convict labor from prisons to work the crops this year. They can%26#039;t find anyone to work the fields. I%26#039;m sure they would LOVE to have a few people from Michigan come on out.|||Call McDonald%26#039;s, they%26#039;ll know what to do.|||By being a coward plain and simple. Besides that will just get him a free ride home for all you cowards that claim unfairness and tax waste bunch of hypocrites|||Go ahead and report them to the INS, local police, Homeland Security, etc.



However, good luck trying to get a response from any of these agencies.



Unless there are hundreds located in one place of employment, they won%26#039;t waste their time.|||Take their pictures, put names to them, get the names of the managers and the business owners and then make a visit to your nearest Homeland Security or Immigration office and ask for a joint meeting between them and the FBI organized crime task force. If you can get pictures of their cars and license plates with them at the cars, that would be a plus. If you can get their addresses, that%26#039;s another plus. Otherwise, do all of the above but mail it to your nearest ICE office. 1-866-DHS2-ICE. And you need to be aware that the illegal immigrant hackers have intercepted some of these telephone calls. You%26#039;d do better to walk the package into the ICE office and have the official sign a receipt for it. Be sure you keep copies of everything and maybe even mail them to the U.S. Attorney General and to trusted friends as insurance.|||Call the INS. If they don%26#039;t respond, call the KKK.|||Call Lou Dobbs and Bill O%26#039;Reilly.|||OK, very smart people... it%26#039;s very easy to answer the question sarcastically. I wonder, which of you are going to fulfill those jobs these people are working for $4/hr? I%26#039;m just wondering.



Stop complaining without bringing %26quot;real%26quot; solutions.|||seems some of these folks need a reality check,the illegals here get the same pay as any one else,4 bucks an hour man are you out of touch.they are felons who have false documents here maybe when they use your social security # and your name you won%26#039;t like it either,plus not a day goes by that you do not hear about the crimes they commit.they suck our social services dry like a parsite so tell me about the poor illegals who do work for 4 bucks an hour and oh yeah work no one else will do man are you so full of it get out of your ivory tower and actually check out the real world you will certainly find out how really stupid you are|||You can call U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at 1 (866) 347-2423 to report any suspicious activity.



Gary M, you%26#039;re just one of the millions of Americans who don%26#039;t understand. I worked on a few fields in Northern California with several illegals. At one place, the max that illegal men were paid was $3 a day while illegal women were paid $1.50 a day and usually did sexual favors in return for more cash. Only four people here had forged documents which consisted of fabricated SSNs. When anyone was sick or injured, they usually still worked because the threat of being deported was used by our book keeper. I think you are the one who needs a reality check.|||Don%26#039;t bother. They are registered as democrats and vote for Granholm. Nothing will happen to them. There are 9 million right now using other people%26#039;s social security numbers. The Government knows who they are.

Can you tell me, how many people who live in Redbridge (North-east london) are unemployed?

I need to find about the employment and unemployment rate in Redbridge for Applied business. i am doing a business coursework; business plan.



Can you tell me, how many people who live in Redbridge (North-east london) are unemployed?credit union





6,236 persons unemplyed (3.64 %)



Compare to:



London 4.36 %



England 3.35 %



So it is below average for London but above average for England.



Can you tell me, how many people who live in Redbridge (North-east london) are unemployed?

loan



Erm 99.9%.............?/?

Question for managers?

The article below presents a solution to a staffing problem.



A. True



B. False



C. Can%26#039;t tell from the text



Businesses often have problems with finding the right employees. However, problems with staffing and retention may not be due to people who are hired and do not work out or a low unemployment rate. In fact, they may be connected to poor management understanding of how employees fit into the business strategy.



Creating a strategic plan and definitive initiatives is the easy part of the formula for success. The difficult part is finding, recruiting and retaining the appropriate talent combination in today%26#039;s market to carry out that plan.



Staffing and retention are major issues in service industry businesses today.



How does the service industry not only recruit new talent, but protect the employees they have? Questions about payment, training, incentives, benefits and work environment will therefore become more important.



what do you think is the right answer? thanks



Question for managers?credit counseling





No solution is in the text. It presents some philosophies and considerations, but no solution.



(B) False



I dont understand the (C) Can%26#039;t tell from the text... seems pretty cut and dried to me... no solution is given



Question for managers?

loan



Yes



I assume you copied this from a web site|||There%26#039;s no direct solution to the staffing issue in the article (A excluded), but there%26#039;re some hints or references such as payments, trainings or work environment indicating the direction of the solution (B excluded). Thus the correct answer will most likely be the C.

Name one country that is better than the U.S.???

Name one Country on Earth where citizens have more freedoms, public safety, lower taxes, higher GDP, higher disposable income, and lower unemployment rate than the U.S.



CITE YOUR ANSWERS!!!



Name one country that is better than the U.S.???credit repair





Thinking.....thinking....still thinking......GOT IT!!



NO Country is better than the U.S. of A!!!!



Name one country that is better than the U.S.???

loan



the north pole = self explanatory|||NONE!!!|||denmark|||It really depends on the situation. Many think Europe as a whole is better but Europe still has an underground caste system. In the US, the wealthy, middle-class and poor intermix more often.|||I guess this is patriotism at it%26#039;s finest.



America has the highest rate of mental illness, the most serial killers, worst cities and higher crime than European and Canadian cities. They are currently taking away our rights slowly but surely as we are coming closer to a fascist state. Has anyone read the Patriot Act? Plus our education is worst than in Europe.|||Explain, define and qualify what you mean by better, please.



For instance, elementary and secondary education comparisons, emotional/social inteligence, school shootings, workplace abuse, children killed by parents,parentskilled by children, spousal abuse, child abuse, rape,theft, complacency of its media and citizens regading falsehoods, increased forclosures, homelesnessness, percentage of imprisoned citizens %26amp;non-citizens, Human rights abuses, environmental abuses, mental health issues, corporate and politcal abuses, international abuses,propaganda abuses....



Please clarify.|||none



U S ******* A to the fullest|||There is no better country! But since 911 the the unemployment rate is alot higher

I'm an american citizen, living in Argentina and i want to move to u.s. with my kids, also Am.

I%26#039;m divorced and I want to move back to Florida with my 3 kids (all naturalized u.s. citizens). If I move without the consent of my ex, will the American Government help us stay in the U.S. or will I have to return to Argentina so their father can see them 4 days out of a month! I have sole custody and he is not involved in helping me raise my kids. His motto: I provide, you raise them. Ya that was great when we were married but there%26#039;s no alimony for ex wives here, only child support and it%26#039;s impossible to find a job here. (high unemployment rate). Also, I don%26#039;t have any family here. I%26#039;m alone. Help!!



I%26#039;m an american citizen, living in Argentina and i want to move to u.s. with my kids, also Am. citizens.Help!!honda finance





if your a american citizen you shouldnt have a problem and the kids are american citizens inform him you wish to move back to the states arrange some type of visitation where he can get them on hoildays and school closings also talk with the courts there good luck report DR.Z a** i did u do it 2



I%26#039;m an american citizen, living in Argentina and i want to move to u.s. with my kids, also Am. citizens.Help!! loan



if you father wants to see his kids it%26#039;s his responsability to come and to wherever the kids are. if he can%26#039;t get into US-- well that%26#039;s his problem.|||call and talk to the U.S. Embassy. They should be able to answer your questions.|||You and your children are American Citizens. I highly doubt The U.S. would make any of it%26#039;s citizens live outside of the country because of visitation! Besides, you said you have sole custody, not joint, so I would think there really wouldn%26#039;t be much HE could do.|||If their is a court order in Argentina that provides that you will make the children accessible to him, he can have the Argentine government ask to extradite you for kidnapping, if you leave the country without his permission.



You need to contact a US attorney that has expertise in marital and international law. Google for attorneys in Florida.|||Since you are all US citizens, then I recommend that you and your children get to Florida as quickly as possible. If you have sole custody, this should not be a problem. Your ex husband will have to return to the US to petition family court for visitation rights, which you can contest. There is NO WAY you will have to send your children to S. America four days out of every month. Worry about that when you get here. Just LEAVE! Once the US family court is involved he will HAVE to at least pay child support if he wants to ever see the kids. Get on expedia.com, get your tickets, and get the hell outta there!|||You have answered your own question. Once you arrived here there is a high statistics that any judge would gave you again full custody of your children and you can still fill out for child support even if you would never get it, but if he comes over to see the kids and he is acting up you can get him for lack of child support and have him spend a few months in jail. Remember once you leave Argentina he is SOL since he would not be able to do anything against you because Argentinian%26#039;s laws do not stand in any court in the USA. Good luck and welcome to the welfare system.|||American Embassy, you need to contact them.



If not, try our Government. I hope you have



birth certificates for the children.



Good luck.|||Under Argentinian law, you cannot travel outside Argentina with the children without the permission of the non-travelling parent. (1)



You will need to consult with an attorney on how you can return to the U.S. wiithout losing custody of the children. I did find the reference below. (2)



And, you should make contact with the American embassy in Argentina to seek their advice or, at least, a referral to an attorney in Argentina who can help. (3)|||Come home, the government will protect you.

Who is feeding unemployed in asia ?

In Asian countries unemployment rate is very high and there is no government assistance. How are they surviving?



Who is feeding unemployed in asia ?heart rate monitor





ha ha, you%26#039;ve never been to china. that%26#039;s OK, ill fill you in. when i went to china, the one thing i noticed (took me a while to realize what was so strange) that there are no stray dogs/cats, no birds, squirrels, any small animals. i asked our guide and he said that people who cant afford food eat what they can find because the Chinese have no tolerance for beggars. it was shocking but true. kinda gross huh?

Surely we do not need to import as many goods as we do today?

I found it incredible whilst watching the scavengers at Branscombe beach after the %26#039;Napoli%26#039; disaster to see people even grabbing training shoes and many other objects that surely can be manufactured in this country. Nappies must have taken the biscuit, fancy having to import them. If more was made here surely the unemployment rate would go down!



Surely we do not need to import as many goods as we do today?credit card debt





You are absolutely right that manufacturing more products domestically will drive down unemployment. However, how much more are you willing to pay for these products? It%26#039;s almost a dead certainty that the products you name are imported because they are cheaper to manufacture overseas. If you%26#039;re willing to pay 20% to 100% more for these products, there is probably a domestic manufacturer to make them.



However, you%26#039;re right about unemployment and imported products.



Surely we do not need to import as many goods as we do today?

loan



Yeah. Nice theory.|||Certainly, any country can make its own goods while importing only a few raw materials that they do not have themselves (and exporting raw materials they have in abundance to countries that do not).



However, many companies seem to think they are saving money by having things manufactured overseas where the wages are less, and where anti-pollution standards and taxes aren%26#039;t quite as high. In return, we get cheap goods....and I%26#039;m not just talking cost. I%26#039;m talking things that are meant to break down in less than a year and are quickly thrown away so that you are forced to buy another one.



Its all in the name of business.|||There is definitely something wrong with the world economy when it is cheaper for Americans to buy so much imported stuff than to make it locally. And what is wrong is that there are rich and poor countries, and cheap transportation which allows the poor countries to make stuff and sell it at higher prices in the rich areas. The solution is to make America poor or China rich. We are working on the second choice right now.|||This is globalisation for you. Money and goods move everywhere, and don%26#039;t call me Shirley.|||People can be exploited in other countries and therefore the profit margins are bigger. Workers are protected in the UK.



Companies are not interested in ecological views or even providing employment. Money talks.|||The problem is, in order for a free market to actually work we need free passage of labour. That would mean that they couldn%26#039;t pay garment workers in Taiwan a pittance, as all the best ones would just go to the USA to work at American Apparel - much like African and Indian doctors do now. But because business and trade can flow freely over borders but people can%26#039;t, the working man gets stiffed.|||This is the New World and we have to compete or become poorer.We had it our own way for a while but the world doesn%26#039;t owe us a living . The sooner we wake up the better.|||I don%26#039;t know where you get the idea that there is big unemployment in the UK. There isn%26#039;t. In some regions jobs could be more plentiful but in most places if you want a job there is one waiting. Also, what has happened is that we are no longer a manufacturing Nation. We are a %26quot;clever-clogs%26quot; country. We have the ideas and plan the goods which get made up in the far East. The UK economy has been incredibly good under this arrangement. But to benefit from it you need to educate yourself to a good level. Do you really want to compete or think it fair to against people of lesser opportunity who are happy to earn a couple of 锟 an hour in an emerging country. We live in a world and every one deserves enough money to buy food|||This trend is determined by consumers.



Please be aware of what you are buying, buy American made goods, save your own job and also the environment.



It鈥瞫 true that manufacturing practices in the developing countries harm the planet.|||Unions wont allow it to be profitable to our company%26#039;s

Which of the following is likely to occur in the U.S. economy as a result of the decline in oil pric

The prices of oil, gasoline, and other petroleum products, which are key inputs in production, have been decreasing in recent months. Other things being equal, which of the following is likely to occur in the U.S. economy as a result of the decline in oil prices?



(a) An increase in the unemployment rate.



(b) A decrease in both equilibrium price level and equilibrium real GDP.



(c) A decrease in the equilibrium price level and an increase in equilibrium real GDP.



(d) An increase in both equilibrium price level and equilibrium real GDP.



Which of the following is likely to occur in the U.S. economy as a result of the decline in oil prices?care credit





I%26#039;m convinced that our oil crisis will force us to be the leading marketer of alternative fuels, propelling us upward economically while simultaneously forcing our Arab enemies out of the world market. USA! USA! USA!

Who are willing to invest in Liberia that has Africa 1st female President and a new democracy after

For fourteen years from 1989 to the signing of the Accra Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in August of 2003, Liberia was in a constant state of conflict. In a nation of only three and half million people, it is estimated that the war took over 250,000 lives and displaced a million people, including hundreds of thousands of refugees who fled the country. It is difficult to exaggerate the devastation this protracted civil war has had on Liberia%26#039;s physical, social, political and economic infrastructure. Liberia%26#039;s human development indicators reflect the alarming condition of its people. Over 80% of Liberia%26#039;s population is illiterate and lives below the poverty line. The unemployment rate exceeds 70%. Thirty-five percent of Liberians are malnourished, only 28% are fully immunized, just 25% have access to safe drinking water, and only 36% have access to sanitation facilities.



Who are willing to invest in Liberia that has Africa 1st female President and a new democracy after 14yrs war?inflation rate





What any body should look is growth opportunity, so decision should be rationale.



Who are willing to invest in Liberia that has Africa 1st female President and a new democracy after 14yrs war? loan



To me you have answered the question and I agree with you.

Why did Democrats campaign with no plan to do anything but bash the war?

Our unemployment rate is lower than its ever been, dow is as high as its ever been, gas prices are at an affordable $2.08, America hasnt been attacked since 9/11, tax cuts put more money in our pockets. Our economy is booming right now, and idiots of America have voted in a democratic house and senate that has campaigned with no plan to do anything but destroy the good path America is going in. I am in shock at this horrible election result...Liberalism didnt win this election and will never win an election. Republicanism lost it because people are so naive on the war on terror. This world was going in the right direction until this election result happened. Al queda is probably rejoicing with this election...



Why did Democrats campaign with no plan to do anything but bash the war?credit bureau





Because the war is very unpopular.



People felt like they were mislead into this war.



And it is not going well -- more than 100 U.S. soldiers were killed by enemy combatants in October 2006, the deadliest month in almost two years.



As for naivety about the war on terror -- what do you call invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11? What do you call diverting attention from Osama and Al-Queda and the real culprits? Al-Queda is still our enemy. The Democrats know this. The voters know this. And Al-Queda knows it.



Let%26#039;s get back to a strategic war on terror, rather than using it as a smokescreen for conflicts with countries like Iraq.



Why did Democrats campaign with no plan to do anything but bash the war?

loan



Sore loser, just as expected.|||THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1|||our unemployment is the lowest it has been in 5 years.. not ever.. so it%26#039;s lowest it%26#039;s been for the Bush administration.. and isn%26#039;t as good as Clinton%26#039;s was... 3 years ago any American would have laughed if you told them to pay 2.08 for gas... terrorist attacks are averaging about every 8 years right now.. so we are not due yet... Bush%26#039;s tax plan bankrupt our nation... the %26quot;booming%26quot; economy is a 2 week trend out of 6 years of crap and the current boom doesn%26#039;t help the middle class... good path? we are heading towards WW III if we would have left it to republican control.. but nice try on your fictitious propaganda|||First the economy is not as good as they say, and gas prices who would thought that 218 a gallon which it is were I live, is great, Look were it has been. America is now at the lowest level it has ever been with the world. Bush lied about the war. and don%26#039;t you understand that they have taking more of our constitutional freedoms away then at any other time in history? Once they start to fall, they wont stop. there in the name of security, but at what price?



Does anyone really now the ramifications of this. I bet most have no idea. and Bush wasn%26#039;t listening to us. and it was all his way or the highway. now he is totally changing saying he didn%26#039;t explain himself right. yes he did, we just didn%26#039;t by it and we are smarter then they think. Were not stupid. Now he wants to work together, Hum were was that before? How quickly things change.

How has the economy improved since 2000?

Several times I%26#039;ve heard people say the economy is much better than it was in 2000.



So I%26#039;m looking...and I see:



Gas prices nearly 3x higher



Health costs much higher..



Wages growing less than inflation



(Sources: Your local gas station,



http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfea...



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...



And you can look at the stock market



When Clinton was President, it went from 3500 in 1993 to over 11,000 by 2001.



When Bush is President, it went from 11,000 to 12,000.



In 2000, the unemployment rate was 4%. Now it was 4.7 for March of this year.



What kind of morons can look at these statistics and say the economy is better in 2007 than it was in 2000?



Unless you%26#039;re a defense contractor, or investing in oil companies, or running a health organization..then the economy is NOT better for everyone else.



How has the economy improved since 2000?child tax credit





I think if you are talking about the economy, it depends on who is doing the talking. When9/11 happened, 1 trillion dollars was ripped from the American economy. Someone has to pay for that - and right now its us! You are right when you say it hasn%26#039;t improved. We are still dealing with the 1 trillion dollar loss AND the Iraqi war that costs billions of dollars everyday. Just because the financial newspapers and the stock market shows a gain, is that gain real or is it just on paper so the people don%26#039;t freak out over this?



America is in a real mess and the only way to stop it is for us to pull out of Iraq and then we need to mend our wounds from 9/11. We can%26#039;t get it done with an moron as a president!



How has the economy improved since 2000?

loan



It%26#039;s certainly no better for me. My company is folding because they can%26#039;t compete with labor costs in India.



Edit:



Not %26quot;my%26quot; company per se, I don%26#039;t own it.|||Everything is twice or more expensive than it was in 2000.|||your paying attention i see? thank you for your service, your a true patriot. halliburton is doing well though, hhmmmm|||It hasn%26#039;t.



Great analysis Ann Marie. I mean it!|||Stock market booming with real profits..not like the Clinton market driven by imaginary dot.com company profits...housing ownership at record level.....record low unemployment...|||Well when Clinton was president, the economy was spiraling in the hole. Bush has brought it back up to better than it%26#039;s been ever. I know you%26#039;re going to say the it was better in Clinton%26#039;s time but if we look at it the way you do, it was MUCH better before he was president. I remember selling a pack of cigarettes and a gallon of gas for the same price which was 36 cents.|||The US Economy really has not improved. The high stock prices are priced in dollars which have been losing value. The real value of those stocks compared to the price of commodities or currencies that have not been devalued over the last 7 years (Euros or Canadian) is very unimpressive.|||It has only improved for the rich because the middle class and poor have gained nothing but lower wages and smaller savings.

Why do 'pro-workers' seem to be 'pro-amnesty'?

Ive noticed that the people that seem to be %26#039;pro-workers%26#039; also seem to be %26#039;pro-amnesty%26#039;. have you pro-workers ever thought what would happen if we granted amnesty?



right now, we have a very low unemployment rate. Because it is so low, companies offer incentives for people to stay.. When you have a flood of low skilled workers, why would a company need to pay someone $20 an hour to do a job? If that person quits, there is no problem finding another worker to take that job.



what would that do to americans pay?



I consider myself to be more of a supporter for workers then business, and granting amnesty would be disastrous for american workers.



Why do %26#039;pro-workers%26#039; seem to be %26#039;pro-amnesty%26#039;?mortgage lenders





Your analysis is correct, but some of the traditional pro-worker institutions see things differently. The unions want more dues-paying members, so they tend to side with the illegals. The Democrats envision a %26quot;path to citizenship%26quot; as a means of enrolling new voters. Both groups are very short-sighted - adding a million new workers annually, which is what we%26#039;ve been doing, depresses wages, increases prices for basics like food and housing, and strains the infrastructure to the breaking point, which is why schools and hospitals in CA are going bankrupt. The economic impact of illegal immigration needs to be more fully understood. Then we as a nation need to decide how much of our standard of living we%26#039;re willing to sacrifice to help others - there are millions more wanting to come here - and pass some enforceable laws that help us achieve that goal. Having these decisions imposed from without is simply unacceptable.



Why do %26#039;pro-workers%26#039; seem to be %26#039;pro-amnesty%26#039;? loan



no it wouldnt because they are already here therefore are already at those jobs.they can get pretty much any job unless it takes a degree.if they are already here how will it impact us in the future when they are legal and can obey all laws that you keep complaining they arent abiding by?|||my belief is that illegals were allowed in because it was the end of the baby boom and it was becoming a workers market so they just let in illegals galore which has caused a glut already in some work sectors and kept wages down. like teenagers, low skilled workers and their ability to find jobs.|||We have a 3.5% Unemployment rate Nationally from company CEOs to laborers, If 12 million present workers are deported, who is to take their place, Agribusiness will have 2 options, raise wages and pass the higher cost on to consumers, or close shop and relocate to where the cheap labor is.



Did you know on the international market economy Brazil, is poised to surpass the United States as the number 1 exporter of Food to the world.

What's the official position of Catholic Church on Iraq War?

IRAQ: Diplomacy Not Troops



Many of you probably heard the President outline his plan for a continued U.S. military presence in Iraq - specifically his proposal for an increase in U.S. troops in Iraq. Radio reports this morning noted that the majority of Americans polled disagree with the President%26#039;s strategy. The Center of Concern shares many of these concerns and maintains that a military solution to the crisis in Iraq is not feasible, nor desireable.



Below is a statement issued by concerned Catholic organizations in the U.S., including the Center of Concern, condemning the President%26#039;s strategy in Iraq and calling for an alternative policy of diplomacy and development. We invite you to read the statement and your thoughts on U.S. engagement in Iraq.



RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT%26#039;S PROPOSAL FOR A CHANGE OF COURSE IN IRAQ



January, 2007



On January 10, 2007, President Bush announced a change in Iraq policy. We, as organizations of Catholics and as individuals, come together to respond to these new Iraq initiatives.



We respond in the context of Jesus%26#039; call to us in the beatitudes to be people of peace (Matt 5:9), and to love our enemies (Luke 6:27) as well as the November 2006 statement by the President of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Bishop William S. Skylstad. In that statement, Bishop Skylstad notes that the pain and destruction of the war in Iraq is %26quot;measured in lives lost and many more injured, in widespread sectarian strife, civil insurgency and terrorist attacks, and in the daily struggles of Iraqis to build a decent future for their devastated nation.%26quot; He noted further that the way forward is bleak and stated that %26quot;The Holy See and our Conference now support broad and necessary international engagement to promote stability and reconstruction in Iraq.%26quot;



We are keenly aware that the members of the U.S. military and their families are shouldering the heavy burdens of extended service in Iraq. They risk death and injury of both body and spirit. However, it is crucial to recognize that political and economic concerns, not military issues, are fueling the continuing strife. Therefore, only solutions that combine the political, diplomatic, economic and religious issues Iraqis face will effectively resolve the underlying conflict and bring peace to Iraq. As the last three years have demonstrated, increasing the U.S. troop presence in Iraq will neither address the root causes of civil strife nor quell the violence. Increased U.S. military action will needlessly endanger our troops and detract from effective action to achieve a cease-fire and create peace. Therefore, the escalation of military presence in Iraq is detrimental to our men and women in the armed forces.



The escalation of military action is far more harmful to Iraqi citizens who are paying the ultimate price in ever-increasing numbers through violence, hunger and lack of ordinary services. Every day, more and more ordinary Iraqis are fleeing their homes and becoming refugees - either within Iraq or in neighboring countries. This dislocation spreads religious, economic and political instability around the region, making it increasingly difficult to handle the influx of those traumatized by this war. The escalation of military action is detrimental to the Iraqi people and the surrounding region.



United States citizens are keenly aware that the military is not an effective tool for bringing peace to Iraq. U.S. citizens understand that Iraq is in the midst of a civil war that requires the engagement of all parties in a peace process in order to resolve the issues. Military action in this context only brings more violence and bloodshed and no end to this conflict. The escalation of military action is detrimental the desires of people of the United States.



Finally, only those in the military and their families are sacrificing for the sake of this war. There has been no effort to finance this war with taxes or other military offsets and the war has been funded without consideration of its impact on the overall federal budget. This fiscal irresponsibility will hamper future generations as they are forced to pay the bills for this generation%26#039;s war. The escalation of military action is detrimental to the economic future of the United States.



THEREFORE:



We oppose the proposed escalation of U.S. troops in Iraq noting that prior escalations have not resulted in increased peace and stability. Troop escalations in Baghdad in the late summer and early fall of 2006 resulted in increased violence and death for both U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians.



We support the President%26#039;s call for economic development in Iraq, noting that the current unemployment rate is running at 40 to 50%. Additionally, 60% of the population is under the age of 25 and is in dire need of alternatives to imagine a better future. Any economic development should directly benefit the Iraqi people and their communities, not contractors from other corners of the world.



We urge the President to engage in diplomatic and political negotiations seeking a comprehensive cease fire by all factions in Iraq and the region. The rejection of a comprehensive diplomatic effort is a short-sighted view of American interests. A surge of diplomacy, not an escalation of troops is what is required.



SIMONE CAMPBELL, SSS, Executive Director



NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby



CAROLE SHINNICK, SSND, Executive Director



Leadership Conference of Women Religious



T. MICHAEL McNULTY, SJ, Justice and Peace Director



Conference of Major Superiors of Men



ALEXIA KELLEY, Executive Director



Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good



DAVID A. ROBINSON, Executive Director



Pax Christi USA.



JIM HUG, SJ, President



Center of Concern



MARIE DENNIS, Director



Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns



JOE MOLONEY, OSF, President



Franciscan Federation of the United States



AMY WOOLAM ECHEVERRIA



Columban JPIC Office



JANET GOTTSCHALK, MMS, Director



Medical Mission Sisters%26#039; Alliance for Justice



FRANK McNEIRNEY, National Coordinator



Catholics Against Capital Punishment (CACP)



SEAMUS FINN, OMI, Director,



Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate



Justice, Peace %26amp; Integrity of Creation Office



What%26#039;s the official position of Catholic Church on Iraq War?





lot for me to read. so I am answering the meat of the question, and that would be, no, the Catholic Church did not have an official position but the members each had their own, I am all for more troops in Iraq, I don%26#039;t know about others. You cannot negotiate with terrorists, they have already said, %26quot;convert or die!%26quot;........that says it all for me.



%26quot;Whoever wishes for peace, let him prepare for war.%26quot;, Vegetius.



%26quot;War is the continuation of politics by other means.%26quot;, Karl Von Clausewitz.



What%26#039;s the official position of Catholic Church on Iraq War?

loan



The Pope calls War a Defeat for Humanity: Neoconservative Iraq Just War Theories Rejected|||They don%26#039;t have an %26quot;official%26quot; position. There%26#039;s priests who pray over weapons of war as well as blessing the men who go over to Iraq to %26quot;kill the enemy%26quot;.



According to the Bible that they supposedly preach on and the God they supposedly serve, the official position they should be holding, as well as all of Christendom, is shown by Jehovah(the Catholics use Yahweh which is a translation of Jehovah, God%26#039;s true name) God himself at Exodus 20:13;%26quot;Do not commit murder.%26quot;|||Remember the separation of Church and State?. The Church do not have the right to involve on government policies. The Church is always against any form of war or violence. But it is the government who makes the decisions, not the Church.|||Pastor Billy says: roadwarrior need a lesson in history. The ideal of separation of Church and State was for the protection of Church not State. Now on to the Catholic Church position... it is one which declares the war an unjust action. All American Catholics should be lead by their conscience to not participate.